air vs static

wat would u rather have taken in all the factors etc

Air by a mile if it's on a daily. Yeah static takes more work and looks awesome but air also looks awesome, can go just as low if not lower then also is convenient if your out and about. Don't know what downsides air has as far as handling etc maybe?

but takin into consideration the price etc to coilovers is it really worth it lol and my answer to my own question is YESS lmao but some may disagree lol. if only we had the money lol

Lol that's the only downside that I can see however if u think of the extra petrol we all use going the long way to places just because of speedbumps we probably spend that amount haha

static every time, air is no good for twisty roads as it tries to level its self out all the time

static

Air, speed bump friendly and you can go any where and not worry about it

Static+ ftw

but what about when an air bag bursts then ya stuck slammed on the floor

With static+ you still have coilies so you can still drive if you burst a bag, winning.

yea air ride looks good and can get ya stupidly low and yea it might make your life a living hell with speed bumps but being low isnt just a fad/faze its a life style STATIC FTW!!!!

The air that i'm after go's above the coil-over strut at the front and doesn't use bags just the front and not the back

That sounds like static+

Air if you got the funds

But defo static

would rather just get hydraulics, no bags that might pop to worry about, just like the red ford fiesta has that iam sure people have seen at teeside, but would rather have a reputation of being just as low as air but actually static that would be cool

i agree like wat chinns was with his a4 lol crazy

i loved that car wish he never got rid was pimp as out

Actually hydraulics would be awesome

i just want to raise front (if i remember the kit raises the front by 50m) so i can be speed bump friendly as i have to drive miles out of my way just to get to some places, i remember following you guys around sunderland and i touched the floor 3 times

Well we will see when peppers are on, it mite not even raise it that much, time will tell

Static is definitely for the hardcore dubbers. Like Josh W who went through 2 sumps and a turbo.
I'd definitely have air if I had money to throw about

Well after no end of problems with a badly made kit from Rayvern on my 106 including having a bag burst on the motorway causing damage to brand new paint and bodywork, id be very cautious of having. The Rocco is lowered 80mm on coilies and is bouncy as fook think i need some kind of sticker *Sports bra to be worn at all times (includes Moobs)*

dublass wrote:

Well after no end of problems with a badly made kit from Rayvern on my 106 including having a bag burst on the motorway causing damage to brand new paint and bodywork, id be very cautious of having. The Rocco is lowered 80mm on coilies and is bouncy as fook think i need some kind of sticker *Sports bra to be worn at all times (includes Moobs)*

What coil-overs are you running?

MrJoshJackson wrote:

Static is definitely for the hardcore dubbers. Like Josh W who went through 2 sumps and a turbo.
I'd definitely have air if I had money to throw about

yeah am hardcore!!!

static for me even though i've never been on coilovers before FTW!

Tricksc wrote:

static for me even though i've never been on coilovers before FTW!

Save up the extra cash and get a good set of coil-overs